Paula at Lost in Translation has a really difficult challenge this week – for me anyway! She says that the way deconstruction applies to art is
‘Deconstruction is a way of understanding how something was created, usually things like art, books, poems and other writing. It means breaking something down into smaller parts. Deconstruction looks at the smaller parts that were used to create an object. The smaller parts are usually ideas.’
But is this art or science?
In case you’re as mathematically minded a pea-brain as I am, this is a cryptogram.
Who thinks this ticks the box?
Lucid Gypsy 
Fascinating, Gilly. 🙂
Well! You always surprise!
Thank you, Gilly. I was hoping this challenge will yield in a variety of interpretations and understanding, and I wasn’t wrong. I can’t answer your question if this is art or science or something in between, but your use of the concept and idea is artful.
Definitely not art in my eyes. Another form of Sudoko???? Well maybe not..
Oh heck! Pass! 🙂 🙂 With hugs!
I was easy to figure out the numbers add to the same result. That is highly impressive. I wonder if I would be able to make the same patterns with a different sum other than 33. And I wish a non highlighted grid is shown first to make more difficult to decipher. 😀